Comments on: Against the Grain and the State https://misesindia.in/2018/05/01/against-the-grain-and-the-state/ Economics, Freedom and Peace Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:30:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: PI https://misesindia.in/2018/05/01/against-the-grain-and-the-state/#comment-44 Wed, 02 May 2018 05:36:21 +0000 http://www.misesindia.in/?p=1871#comment-44 In reply to PI.

How is science a system of non- eliefs? Science demands assuming the opposite direction of anything one sets out assert. By negation of assumption one accepts the opposite of assumption.
For example I like to believe I exist. The null hypothesis is opposite to what I like to believe. So, null hypothesis is I don’t exist.
Next I note I have weight. Null hypothesis is absurd. Therefore I exist.

It should be everready to examine any new assertion by above method.

]]> By: PI https://misesindia.in/2018/05/01/against-the-grain-and-the-state/#comment-43 Tue, 01 May 2018 19:40:18 +0000 http://www.misesindia.in/?p=1871#comment-43 Religion also has been shown to be a progress. Aquinas actually had to borrow from the barbarian Aristotle as believers in Christianity had become stupid.

Religion needs to be countered as it attempts to make state into God.

How does one tacke Buddhism (it can be very murderous as seen by Bikkus of Sri Lanka) which looks like materialism?

All religions are system of beliefs. Science is a SYSTEM OF NONBELIEFS. It starts from null hypothesis.

Why is above important?

Mieses (agnostic) “Make an issue a religious issue, and the indifferent and apathetic suddenly become interested. Connect religion with a cause and someone will be willing to die for it.”. Ambedkar wanted to create a sena. Hence he conciously chose religion of Buddhism. Perhaps he did not believe in afterlife. Creator of constitution was an opportunist. Pun is intended in using the word creator.

]]>