Since long world government institutions like the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and the central bankers are pushing for an idea of a cashless economy (Agarwal et al., 2015). Harvard university Keynesian school economist like Kenneth Rogoff wrote a book on the subject The Curse of Cash! India’s popular prime minister Narendra Modi went as far as to implement this idea on 1.4 billion Indians when he banned the use of 500 and 1000 rupees notes in 2016 under his plan of demonetization. One of the goals of that plan was to make India a cashless economy. Although that plan hasn’t materialized in that most of the cash that he took out of circulation was back in the economy after two years. But global authorities and the Indian government have not given up their goal of a cashless economy. Now under the disguise of the Covid-19 pandemic, they are again pushing for a cashless economy. Their argument for banning or discouraging the use of cash now is that, currency notes are a potential carriers of the Coronavirus! The Indian central bank RBI, keeping aside its role of a central planning monetary authority, temporarily assumed a role of an health expert and made this comment,
RBI had affirmed the possibility of currency notes as potential carriers of novel coronavirus and demanded government incentives for digital payments.
in order to limit the coronavirus pandemic, the public can make payments by sitting at homes through various online digital channels like mobile and Internet banking, credit and debit cards etc and avoid using or withdrawing cash to the extent possible.
So why are the authorities around the world pushing for this idea of a cashless economy? Why do they hate cash so much? Let’s see.
Why they want a cashless economy?
In his book The Curse of Cash, Kenneth Rogoff lists down some major reasons why governments and their central bankers want to eliminate the use of cash. These reasons are as follows,
The use of cash to facilitate tax evasion and to by-pass government regulations
The largest holdings and use of cash in the domestic underground economy likely derive from residents of all types (e.g., citizens, green card holders, employers of illegal immigrants) who are broadly engaged in legal activities but who are avoiding taxes, regulations, or employment restrictions. These are mostly otherwise law-abiding citizens who engage in tax evasion opportunistically, because they know that by using cash, they can hugely reduce their chances of ever getting caught.
Outright criminal activities
Ken Rogoff says,
We next turn to the use of cash in outright criminal activities, both domestic and foreign. Criminal financing involves many modalities besides cash.
Another area where society incurs massive social costs is the use of cash to corrupt and bribe public officials. The social costs of corruption presumably are orders of magnitude greater than the scale of the bribes themselves, but even estimates of the payments are staggering.
Other reasons listed are, Human Trafficking; Human Smuggling, and Exploitation of Migrants; Terrorism, Illegal immigration and border control, Counterfeiting, and Public health,
In addition to facilitating criminal activities, used paper currency can be a vehicle for spreading disease. Researchers at New York University analyzed $1 bills and found evidence of thousands of microbes, including a wide range of bacteria, even some antibiotic-resistant ones. Though most people are aware of the hygiene problems associated with handling cash, one can imagine paper currency being an agent of transmission in some future pandemic.
Reading the last statement one wonders if the present Indian government is dancing on the tunes of these international forces. If not dancing then they are definitely taking a cue from books like Rogoff’s. The Covid-19 pandemic is a perfect pretext for the powers to be to grab more powers in the name of saving humanity from a mostly harmless virus. As the former Chicago mayor Rahm Immanual once said, government should never let a serious crisis go to waste! Covid-19 is a perfect example of this. And, what this also means is, government can create/manufacture a serious crisis to grab more powers to do things they couldn’t do without that crisis like banning the use of cash and making economy cashless for their own good.
Is this Cashless economy a good idea for we the people?
As individual citizens of different nation states, we can easily see that all above listed reasons are for government to increase its power and control over our lives. For common people, a cashless economy will be a disaster as that type of economy will be controlled by a totalitarian government. What Rogoff thinks is good for the government is not good for the common people, especially the productive tax payer. To understand this one has to understand the true nature of the state aka the government. As the German sociologist Franz Oppenheimer very eloquently explained in his book The State: Its History and Development Viewed Sociologically, human society is always divided between two classes of people. On the one side is those people who live their lives using economic means of productive work producing surplus goods, selling that surplus in the market and earning their living honestly in that process. On the other side there are those people who live their lives using political means of stealing/robbing others’ hard earned income. The state and all its officials, including intellectuals like Kenneth Rogoff, are part of the second group who use the political means of legal plunder. We can easily see that there is an inherent antagonism between these two groups of people in the society. If one gains then the other necessarily looses as the former gains at the cost of the latter. If a cashless economy is good for the government to increase their control over taxpaying citizens’ lives then that definitely means productive people and with them common people are going to suffer. Only state officials who are living parasitically will benefit, in the short run, from a cashless economy. In the long run a society of parasites will be doomed. Progress of human species demands that people using economic means should win in this battle of survival because without production, consumption, which is the final goal of all economic activities, will be impossible. The state will also be doomed if they keep on fleecing the productive people of the society because without them parasitical state cannot survive for long. With a cashless economy state officials will basically stab in their own back!
The program of cashless economy rests on a faulty Keynesian economics premise of government, and its socialism in the form of various regulations and controls on the market economy, is beneficial for all of us. This premise is faulty and wrong because, as the Austrian school economists like Ludwig von Mises and Murray Rothbard have shown, government’s central planning and its socialist calculation is simply impossible. That central planning will damage the economy and society and doom the country as history has shown us time and again. The best way to organize an economy is to go the free market capitalist way. Laissez Faire is the best policy to solve the economic problem of ‘what to produce, how to produce and for whom to produce’. Market’s price and profit and loss system is the best way to allocate society’s scarce resources where they are most urgently needed. Government is a parasitical institution feeding off the productive sector of the society and it can’t do any good in the end. It can only destroy our scarce resources thus by making us all poor, hungry and dead in the end.
The idea of a cashless economy only has one goal and that is to increase government control over the lives of ordinary citizens who are already burdened with all kinds of controls. All reasons listed by economist like Rogoff for a need of a cashless economy are actually a direct result of already existing strict government controls e.g., Rogoff, instead of planning and scheming to ban the use of cash, should ask himself, why otherwise law abiding citizens are avoiding paying taxes? There must be a reason behind that tax evasion. The major reason is because the tax rates are very high and compliance is very complex e.g., India’s recently imposed GST or the exodus of wealthy people from India and China or the state like California because of heavy taxes and more draconian regulations! The cannon of taxation says that taxes must be low and simple to comply. May be lowering taxes and making them more simple will result in more compliance if that is what the state officials want! Corruption is again a direct result of more government interventions in the economy. When at each and every step people will have to take permission of politicians and bureaucrats then that gives a chance to those state officials to demand money for pushing the file on next table. Government licensing bureaus are also used by business tycoons to eliminate their competition by giving bribes to politicians and bureaucrats. In such a suffocating socialist economy, as Mises said, corruption is actually the vent through which an economy breathes and survives. Ending government bureaus/departments will end corruption. Rolling back the government is the solution of the problem of corruption, but state officials will not roll back their powers. Illegal migration is also a direct result of draconian government powers in a country from where people are fleeing. Historically people have fled from an oppressive government to an area where governments are less oppressive. This means, ending government oppression will end illegal migration too. That will also end problem of border control. When Mexico or Cuba or Afghanistan or India etc. countries will be prosperous, no citizen of those countries will die to get an American passport. Also, when there will be no Western nation state waged wars in the Middle East, there will be no refugee and migration crisis in the West. And as far as terrorism goes, detailed researches of Prof Robert Pape show, the root cause of terrorism is foreign military occupation, which triggers secular and religious people alike to carry out suicide attacks. End that foreign military occupation and you end terrorism. Counterfeiting will also end if we have a world monetary system based on an honest money in the form of commodities like Gold and Silver. Counterfeiting results from the use of dishonest debt based fiat paper currencies of governments. And, central bankers printing these paper currencies without any limits is itself a process of counterfeiting because it robs people of purchasing power of their hard earned income. Will Kenneth Rogoff or world governments and central bankers call for ending the central banks to end the problem of counterfeiting instead of pushing for this idea of cashless economy? No. Because that will take away all powers from the hands of economists like Rogoff and governments.
All in all, a cashless economy if imposed, under the guise of phony reasons given above, will be a nightmare for common people. People will have no place to hide from the government officers who will be knocking on their doors to rob them of their hard earned income. At a whim of politicians or central bankers banks will lock our bank accounts depriving us of our livelihood as we are already seeing in the case of PMC bank. This idea of a cashless economy is a direct attack on our freedom, and so we all must resist it with all our strong resolve.